Read the original article here.

---

Psychological Warfare in the Digital Age: Understanding Manipulation and Control

Psychological warfare, often abbreviated as PSYWAR or PsyOp (Psychological Operations), is an ancient practice that has found potent new forms in the digital age. At its core, it is the planned use of psychological methods to influence the minds, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors of a target audience. While historically employed primarily in military conflicts, these techniques are now widely applied by state and non-state actors across various domains, including politics, social movements, and even commerce, often leveraging the vast reach and targeting capabilities of digital technologies and data.

What is Psychological Warfare?

Psychological warfare encompasses a range of actions aimed at influencing specific psychological reactions in others to achieve one's own objectives. It's not just about persuasion; it can be about undermining morale, inducing desired behaviors (like surrender or protest), reinforcing favorable attitudes, or creating confusion and distrust.

Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR / PsyOp): The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of a target audience in such a way as to support the achievement of specific objectives. This can involve military forces, governments, organizations, or other actors.

The term has evolved and is known by various names, including Military Information Support Operations (MISO), political warfare, "Hearts and Minds" campaigns, and propaganda. These operations are not limited to influencing enemy soldiers but can target governments, organizations, groups, and crucially, civilian populations in foreign territories. The goal is often to create an effect that indirectly or directly benefits the originator, such as causing pressure on a government by influencing its citizens.

Core Techniques and Aims

Psychological warfare utilizes a variety of techniques to achieve its aims. These include:

• Influencing Values and Beliefs: Shifting what a target audience holds dear or believes to be true.
• Manipulating Emotions and Motives: Evoking feelings like fear, hope, anger, nostalgia, or appealing to specific motivations to drive action or inaction.
• Altering Reasoning and Behavior: Encouraging specific decision-making processes or directly prompting desired actions (e.g., surrendering, protesting, voting a certain way).
• Demoralization: Tactics specifically designed to lower the morale, confidence, and will to fight or resist in an adversary group (like troops or a population under occupation). Examples include spreading rumors of defeat, highlighting poor conditions, or using psychological pressure techniques.
• Inducing Confessions or Compliance: Using psychological pressure during interrogation or occupation.
• Reinforcing Favorable Attitudes: Solidifying support among allies or neutral parties.

These psychological methods are sometimes combined with other forms of action:

• Black Operations: Covert operations that are not attributable to the entity carrying them out.
• False Flag Tactics: Operations designed to appear as though they were carried out by someone else.

Propaganda: A Key Instrument

Propaganda is a fundamental tool within psychological warfare. It involves the dissemination of information (or misinformation) to influence public opinion. The nature of propaganda can be categorized based on its truthfulness and source attribution:

Propaganda: Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. In psychological warfare, it is strategically crafted communication aimed at influencing target audiences.

Daniel Lerner's classification, developed in the context of PSYWAR, outlines three types:

• White Propaganda: This is largely truthful, though often biased through omission and emphasis. The source of the information is openly acknowledged. It aims to build credibility and reinforce existing favorable viewpoints.
• Grey Propaganda: This type is also largely truthful but contains biases, often racial, ethnic, or religious, that cannot be easily disproven. A key characteristic is that the source of the information is not identified. This allows the originator to disseminate potentially controversial messages without direct accountability.
• Black Propaganda: Inherently deceitful, black propaganda attributes information to a source other than the true originator. It relies on complete fabrication or significant distortion and aims to create maximum confusion or damage, often leveraging a fake source's supposed credibility.

A crucial axiom in propaganda, as noted by PSYWAR practitioners, is the importance of credibility for long-term persuasion. If a target population repeatedly discovers they have been lied to, the source loses its influence, making sustained campaigns challenging if relying solely on grey or black methods.

The Evolution of Psychological Warfare: From Ancient Battles to Digital Feeds

Psychological warfare is not a modern invention. Throughout history, leaders and military commanders have sought to influence the minds of their enemies and consolidate support among their own people and conquered populations.

• Early Examples: Alexander the Great used cultural assimilation and political co-option alongside military conquest to secure his vast empire. Genghis Khan famously employed terror tactics, deliberate deceptions about troop numbers (like lighting multiple torches per soldier or creating dust clouds), and terrifying sounds (whistling arrows) to break enemy will before battle. Other historical examples include using deception about resources during sieges (Bias of Priene) or conducting symbolic, morale-damaging raids (Hernán Pérez del Pulgar).
• The Rise of Mass Communication: The invention of the printing press and later, technologies like newspapers, radio, and film, dramatically increased the potential reach and impact of psychological operations. Information could be disseminated to a much wider audience, both domestically and abroad.
  • World War I: This era saw the formalization of psychological operations, particularly by the British. Leveraging their strong international news systems, control of communication cables, and diplomatic networks, they distributed vast amounts of propaganda through newspapers, posters, pamphlets (often air-dropped over enemy lines), and even film. Leaflets detailing humane treatment of POWs or highlighting the perceived futility of the enemy's cause were common. Unmanned leaflet balloons were developed to overcome the danger to pilots. The French used visual propaganda. The Central Powers also engaged, notably encouraging 'holy war' and facilitating Lenin's return to Russia to destabilize the Allied Eastern Front.
  • World War II: Deception became highly sophisticated. Operations like the elaborate deceptions leading up to the Normandy landings (Operation Bodyguard/Fortitude) involved creating entirely fictional armies, faking infrastructure buildup, using double agents to feed false information, employing visual decoys like dummy tanks and landing craft, and simulating invasion fleets. These operations aimed to misdirect enemy forces and resources, contributing significantly to Allied success. Radio propaganda was also extensively used by all sides (e.g., Lord Haw-Haw for Germany).
  • Vietnam War: Both sides employed PSYWAR. The US used programs like Phoenix (aimed at disrupting Viet Cong infrastructure and intimidating supporters) and psychological techniques like Operation Wandering Soul (broadcasting eerie sounds to exploit superstitions). The Viet Cong used radio broadcasts by figures like Hanoi Hannah, targeting US troops with news of casualties, anti-war messages, and nostalgic music to demoralize and encourage desertion.
• The 21st Century and the Digital Transformation: The advent of the internet, social media, and ubiquitous connectivity has fundamentally changed the landscape of psychological warfare.

Digital Manipulation: Psychological Warfare in Cyberspace

The core principles of psychological warfare remain the same, but the tools and tactics have evolved dramatically with digital technology. Social media platforms, search engines, online news sites, and messaging apps provide unprecedented channels for conducting psychological operations on a massive scale, often with high levels of precision targeting enabled by data.

Digital Manipulation: The use of digital technologies and platforms to alter or influence information, perception, or behavior, often through deceptive or covert means. In the context of psychological warfare, this involves using digital channels to conduct PsyOp campaigns.

Here's how digital manipulation fuels modern psychological warfare:

1. Reach and Speed: Information (or disinformation) can spread globally almost instantaneously through social media shares, viral videos, and online news propagation. This allows for rapid deployment of psychological tactics and quick adaptation based on real-time feedback.
2. Targeting and Personalization (Using Data): Digital platforms collect vast amounts of data on users – demographics, interests, connections, behavior, location, browsing history. This data can be used to identify specific target audiences and tailor psychological messages to their known biases, fears, desires, and vulnerabilities. Instead of mass leaflets, operations can deliver personalized manipulative content directly to individuals or specific groups.
3. Disinformation and Misinformation Campaigns: The ease of creating and sharing digital content allows for widespread dissemination of false or misleading information.
   • Disinformation: Intentionally false information spread to deceive people.
   • Misinformation: False information spread, regardless of intent. These campaigns can aim to sow discord, undermine trust in institutions (governments, media, science), manipulate public opinion on political issues, or damage the reputation of adversaries. Examples include doctored images or videos, fake news websites, and coordinated inauthentic behavior (fake accounts, bots). Recent conflicts, like the Syrian Civil War and the conflict in Ukraine, have shown extensive use of doctored photos and coordinated online narratives, often with suspected state involvement.
4. Exploiting Algorithms: Social media algorithms are designed to maximize engagement, often by promoting emotionally charged or controversial content. PSYWAR practitioners can exploit these algorithms to ensure their manipulative content reaches a wider audience and spreads rapidly within target groups.
5. Covert Influence Operations: Actors can create networks of fake accounts (troll farms, bots), personas, and seemingly independent news sites or groups online to push specific narratives or amplify messages while hiding their true identity and agenda. A recent audit involving social media companies identified suspected covert online influence operations linked to military personnel, using fake accounts across multiple platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, etc.) to promote pro-Western narratives and criticize adversaries like Iran, China, and Russia.
6. Cognitive Warfare: Emerging concepts like "cognitive warfare" explicitly recognize the digital realm as a battle space for influencing how people perceive, think, and act. This involves not just traditional propaganda but also leveraging displays of force (even staged ones), psychological pressure online, and integrated disinformation campaigns aimed at the cognitive processes of individuals and groups. China and the US have been described as engaging in this in areas like the South and East China Seas.
7. Cyber-Enabled Psychological Pressure: While "Shock and Awe" was a physical manifestation, digital equivalents can include targeted cyberattacks designed to cause panic, disrupt essential services, or steal and leak embarrassing information to psychologically pressure individuals or organizations.

Case Studies in Modern Psychological Warfare (with Digital Aspects)

Several countries have developed sophisticated psychological operations capabilities, increasingly integrating digital methods:

• China: Views influencing the enemy's mind as crucial, drawing on ancient strategies. Their approach involves mobilizing loyalists (Marxism), applying economic and military pressure, controlling domestic media for propaganda, and engaging in cognitive warfare (e.g., against Taiwan) which includes shaping perceptions online.
• Israel: The revelation that a popular online news page ("Abu Ali Express") reporting on Arab affairs was run by a consultant paid by the IDF demonstrates the use of seemingly independent online personas for psychological operations.
• Russia: While the article mentions historical Soviet activities, contemporary Russian PSYWAR is closely associated with large-scale online disinformation and influence campaigns. These aim to destabilize adversaries, interfere in elections, and promote specific geopolitical narratives using state-sponsored media, troll farms, and sophisticated hacking/leaking operations.
• United Kingdom: Has specialized units like the 15 Psychological Operations Group and the 77th Brigade. Revelations about GCHQ's JTRIG group highlighted their methods for covertly manipulating online communities, including "discrediting" targets, planting misinformation, and disrupting communications – direct examples of digital psychological warfare. The MoD is also actively funding research into new methods of psychological warfare, likely incorporating digital techniques.
• United States: Defines psychological warfare as influencing opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior to support national objectives. Units like the CIA's Special Activities Center are involved in covert political influence and psychological operations. The Army integrates "Inform and Influence Activities" into operations planning. The recent DoD audit of covert online operations highlights the scale and secrecy sometimes involved in modern US digital PSYWAR efforts.

Terrorism as Psychological Warfare

Terrorism, while a form of violence, is fundamentally a strategy of psychological warfare.

Terrorism (in the context of PSYWAR): A strategy employing violence and threats of violence to weaken a target country's sense of security, disturb daily life, and damage its ability to function. The primary aim is to influence public opinion and pressure leaders into conceding to the terrorists' demands, effectively using the population as leverage.

Terrorist acts are often highly symbolic and publicized to maximize their psychological impact, spreading fear far beyond the immediate victims. In the digital age, terrorist groups also utilize online platforms for propaganda, recruitment, radicalization, and coordinating psychological intimidation campaigns.

Conclusion: The Challenge of Digital Psychological Warfare

Psychological warfare is an enduring aspect of conflict and competition, evolving with technology. The rise of digital platforms has provided potent new capabilities for influencing populations, often covertly and at scale. The ability to target specific individuals or groups with tailored manipulative content based on data, coupled with the rapid spread afforded by social media algorithms, presents significant challenges for individuals, societies, and governments. Understanding the historical roots and modern digital manifestations of psychological warfare is crucial for recognizing manipulation, building resilience, and navigating the complex information landscape of the digital age.